DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4
Hits 1 – 20 of 67

1
A corpus-based approach in archaeolinguistics
In: Journal of Applied Linguistics and Lexicography, Vol 2, Iss 2 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
2
Cultural vocabulary in teaching Turkish as a foreign language
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 338-358 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
3
THE DISCURSIVE CONSTRUCTION OF INDIGENOUS BELIEF ISSUE IN THE JAKARTA POST
In: Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, Vol 5, Iss 2, Pp 417-430 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
4
A method to update traditional explanatory dictionaries
In: Taikomoji kalbotyra, Vol 16 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
5
Communicating Sustainable Tourism in English and Italian: A Contrastive Analysis
In: Linguae &. Rivista di Lingue e Culture Moderne, Vol 19, Iss 2, Pp 133-154 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
6
Um corpus de Estudos de Gênero: por quê, como e para quê? / A Gender Studies corpus: why, how and for what?
In: Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, Vol 29, Iss 2, Pp 739-770 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
7
The Pragmatics of Aeronautical English: an investigation through Corpus Linguistics / A Pragmática do inglês aeronáutico: uma investigação pela Linguística de Corpus
In: Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, Vol 29, Iss 2, Pp 1381-1414 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
8
Hedging modal adverbs in Slovenian academic discourse
In: Slovenščina 2.0: Empirične, aplikativne in interdisciplinarne raziskave, Vol 9, Iss 1 (2021) (2021)
BASE
Show details
9
English and Russian Genitive Alternations: A Study in Construction Typology
In: Russian Journal of Linguistics, Vol 24, Iss 1, Pp 96-116 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
10
Media Bias: A Corpus-based Linguistic Analysis of Online Iranian Coverage of the Syrian Revolution
In: Open Linguistics, Vol 6, Iss 1, Pp 584-600 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
11
Subject-Operator Disagreement in English Existential Constructions: A Corpus-Based Analysis of American English and Hong Kong English
In: Applied Linguistics Research Journal, Vol 4, Iss 3, Pp 1-12 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
12
Eesti temperatuuriadjektiivide polüseemiamallid
In: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat, Vol 16, Pp 223-240 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
13
E-patients in Oncology: a corpus-based characterization of medical terminology in an online cancer forum
In: Ibérica, Vol 39, Pp 69-96 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
14
Der LeGeDe-Prototyp: Zur Erstellung eines korpusbasierten Online-Wörterbuchs zu lexikalischen Besonderheiten im gesprochenen Deutsch. Aktueller Stand und Perspektiven
In: Lexikos, Vol 30, Pp 197-237 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
15
Análisis del uso peculiar americano de la partícula ‘hasta’ en la ciudad de Monterrey, México
In: Linguistica Pragensia, Vol 30, Iss 1, Pp 9-29 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
16
There are differences between scientific and non-scientific English indeed: a case study
In: Linguistica Pragensia, Vol 30, Iss 2, Pp 187-203 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
17
The New Chinese Corpus of Literary Texts Litchi
In: Acta Linguistica Asiatica, Vol 10, Iss 2 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
18
Size of corpora and collocations: The case of Russian
In: Slovenščina 2.0: Empirične, aplikativne in interdisciplinarne raziskave, Vol 8, Iss 2 (2020) (2020)
BASE
Show details
19
Review of Corpus Linguistics for Vocabulary: A Guide for Research
In: Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol 5, Iss 3, Pp 543-545 (2019) (2019)
BASE
Show details
20
Exploring syntactic complexity and its relationship with writing quality in EFL argumentative essays
In: Topics in Linguistics, Vol 20, Iss 1, Pp 68-81 (2019) (2019)
Abstract: To predict syntactic complexity in second/foreign language writing, some studies have advocated the use of T-unit and clausal subordination measures while others have argued for the use of phrase-based measures. This study seeks to identify syntactic features that can be regarded as discriminators among different levels of writing quality. For this purpose, a corpus of argumentative essays by EFL learners was compiled and then the essays were rated and placed into three groups of high-rated, mid-rated, and low-rated essays. The corpus was then coded and analysed for both phrasal and clausal features. The phrasal features were manually coded based on the development scheme hypothesized by Biber, Gray and Poonpon (2011) for academic writing, and the clausal features were analysed using the online L2 Syntactic Complexity Analyzer developed by Lu (2010). A separate ANOVA test was used to compare the three groups of essays for each of the phrasal and clausal features. The findings of the current study demonstrated that subordination and dependent clauses were not good indicators of different writing qualities in our corpus. Also, the pattern of noun phrase complexity predicted by Biber et al. (2011) was not observed across argumentative essays from three different levels of writing quality.
Keyword: argumentative essays; corpus linguistics; efl learners; P1-1091; Philology. Linguistics; phrasal features; t-unit
URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0005
https://doaj.org/article/40dec620a99a41c3a54d1f80924f0f21
BASE
Hide details

Page: 1 2 3 4

Catalogues
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bibliographies
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
67
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern